Back some time ago, we as a community agreed that what Jesus ultimately calls us to is simply to become disciples and then make disciples. We aren't called to perfect attendance for ourselves or big numbers on Sunday's . We aren't called to theological brilliance. We aren't called to technical or programming perfection, or even competence for that matter. We aren't called to devotional piety. We aren't called to many of the things that tend to give pastors piece of mind and personal esteem in front of their colleagues when questioned "How is your church doing?". We are called to discipleship, both personal and progressing outward.
In my earliest days of following Jesus ... or probably more honestly, following church, I don't ever recall imagining that I could ever become a "disciple". In fact, as I remember it, a disciple was one of Jesus' immediate followers, often to be confused, at least in my mind, with an apostle. Back in that day, they were "the" disciples, blindly and faithfully ... sometimes... following Jesus on great adventures, being pressed by great and at the same time troubling counter cultural teaching. They experienced healings and feedings and miracles. The impression I had was that they were disciples, they were called to that. I was called, we were called to be "Christians". What they had was supernatural, otherworldly, and revolutionary. What I bought into was organized, neatly packaged and comfortable. We were called to moral purity and being nice, neither of which has proven to be attainable. I was, and millions like me, led insidiously back into a well disguised form of "The Law" which manifests itself in morality and well produced Sunday worship. Check those off and I'm a good "Christian".
I have been a practitioner of the pastoral arts long enough to remember that this is indeed the formula that I was taught would bring "success" in my field. Simply get people to show up ... in increasing numbers... and behave themselves and I could rest easily. It seemed like a great and workable plan, at least until it wasn't. Ironically, for me at least, about the same time that the whisper became uncomfortably loud, I began to hear the term "disciple" filtering through the undercurrent. Eventually, like many things evangelical, a right and pure idea gained enough traction for entrepreneurs and marketers to bring it precariously close to fad status. Books were written, conferences were formed, staff positions were created. A congregation of mine even became part of a disciple making... wait for it ... program, in which we sank thousands of dollars to learn this most basic, fundamental and simple truth of following Jesus; A follower of Jesus, a Christian, was and is simply, yet profoundly, a disciple.
So then the question for me became, how does one really become a "disciple"? Ironically, the model I came back to was those first followers that I was led to believe were a unique class of "Christian". Their lives certainly didn't model moral purity and programming excellence. They simply spent time with Jesus, they spent time in community, and then they followed him into the midst of those whom he loved unconditionally. That's what I'd call "The Whole Package". That is becoming a "disciple".
That's what Common Table is about:
Spending time with Jesus (Love God)
Spending time in community (Live well)
Following Him into the midst of those He loves unconditionally (Do Good)
Thursday, August 27, 2015
Thursday, August 20, 2015
legacy part 2
Last week we came to the end of Hebrews 11 and began to put it into perspective within the context of our own lives and influences. When you have lived "x" number of days and are gone, what will be your legacy? What will you have been commended for? We shared snap shots of our own faith journeys. We considered the names of those who influenced us on our pursuit of Jesus. Everyone is entirely different, yet everyone has a story. This week we will be wrapping it up with some additional biblical context as well as more reflection on our own journeys.
Two questions to consider:
1. If you would be remembered for one aspect of your "faith", (based on your life to this point) what would that be?
2. If you could actively improve or advance in one area of your journey, what would that be?
Two questions to consider:
1. If you would be remembered for one aspect of your "faith", (based on your life to this point) what would that be?
2. If you could actively improve or advance in one area of your journey, what would that be?
Wednesday, July 29, 2015
On death and disappearing
Tucked into this list in Hebrews 11 is a name that is not nearly as familiar as the others. Enoch is not necessarily a character that you'd hear about on your average Sunday morning from your average preacher. I don't know that I've ever really heard an entire message based around him. Like the rest of those contained in this list we can look back and find reference to him in the Old Testament, this time again in Genesis. Before you get too excited, when you wander back in to Genesis 5 to read about him, you find him hidden in another list. It's a genealogy actually ... One of those "this guy lived, and his son was, and his son was, and his son was" kind of lists that we tend to gloss over. This time he is tucked into a list of nine defendants of Adam. Each lived a number of years, had sons of their own and "then he died"... All except for one. Seven times the story goes this way, then for Enoch it records that he disappeared " for God took him". Then for the last name it goes back to the expected "then he died" ending. You might overlook it as just an oddity with the recording method of the author of Genesis except for one other interesting difference. Each of these others are recorded simply as having lived x number of years and then dying. Enoch is recorded as having "walked with God" before disappearing. Sunday we are going to dig into what the authors of Hebrews and Genesis might be telling us about Enoch's uniqueness and what does it mean that someone could "walk with God" in such a way as to have it recorded and commended.
Wednesday, July 22, 2015
first
One of the earliest referred to as being commended for their faith in Hebrews 11 is Abel. I love that Abel is in here because his story represents a very relevant faith practice that I find is fundamental to the discipleship process. The story of Cain and Abel forces me to self examine in the space of where I place God in my priorities. In the earlier years of Saturday Night Live, Billy Crystal played a character named Fernando. One of the most notable lines from Fernando is "Looking good is better than being good". On the surface this may seem like a throwaway line, but its actually quite profound. It applies here in the story of Cain and Abel. It actually identifies the sometimes murky but actually quite profound difference between their gifts offered before God. It also identifies a constant struggle in my own spiritual journey pursuing Jesus. What is the difference between the two ... looking good and being good I mean ... glad you asked. "Looking good", in my opinion, is the shortcut that we attempt in our original desire to follow Jesus. "Being good" is a point of spiritual maturity where you just have God as preeminent in all things. Cain and Abel both made offerings to God and yet one was accepted and one not so much. Look closely and you see that the difference was that one gave "some" and the other gave first and from the first. Cain gave some in a desire to "look good" while Able gave first as a reflection of "being good". The gifts revealed where each was at. The thing that is often tragically overlooked though, but must not be, is that Cain was not condemned for his gift. The indication is that it was an opportunity for teaching, that Cain would have had another shot. It was grace in its earliest form. The bar was set at a certain height and he had another shot at getting over it. Instead he chose to eliminate the bar.
Too many times I have chosen to eliminate the bar. Too often I'm attempting to take the shortcut of "looking good" rather than investing in the journey of "being good". And so the question continues ... "Am I giving Him my first or am I giving what's left over?" When it comes to resources, it's really not that difficult to determine ... all I need to do is look at my bank statements. When it comes to my time, all I really need to do is look at my calendar. Fortunately ... Each day I get to do it over again, and prayerfully I'll choose to clear the bar rather than eliminate it.
Too many times I have chosen to eliminate the bar. Too often I'm attempting to take the shortcut of "looking good" rather than investing in the journey of "being good". And so the question continues ... "Am I giving Him my first or am I giving what's left over?" When it comes to resources, it's really not that difficult to determine ... all I need to do is look at my bank statements. When it comes to my time, all I really need to do is look at my calendar. Fortunately ... Each day I get to do it over again, and prayerfully I'll choose to clear the bar rather than eliminate it.
Wednesday, July 15, 2015
Summer travels
Friday, May 15, 2015
devotion and the bride
Wrestling with our text in Acts 2 where the earliest form of the church emerges, I keep running into the word "devoted". As a practitioner of the pastoral arts for more than two decades ... Yes that makes me old ... I have long been in pursuit of what I would term the "keys of engagement" which would unlock the door of meaningful participation in the life of the local church. I have lived through terms like "relevant" and "seeker", "missional", "attractional", "emergent" and many others that have been spoken into the dilemma of steady declines in church participation and attendance. The recent report from the Pew Research Group clearly demonstrates that none of these discussions really offers silver bullet solutions. The "rise of the nones" rings as clearly or perhaps more so in the great city of Seattle. Could it be that this word "devoted" need be reinserted into the discussion? Could it be something so radical as to put some biblical perspective back into our quest to find the missing link that would ... Although not solve it ... at least explain what has really occurred?
Could we put it in these terms ... that the Church in our culture struggles with the concept of being devoted to the biblical community often referred to as "the bride" of Christ.
The Acts 2 usage of the term "devoted" is used 5 other places in New Testament teaching, all referring to the idea of sacrificial, persevering and continual steadfastness. As one who has lead many couples through their marriage ceremonies, all speaking in various terms that would be descriptive of this concept, I know only too well of the disconnect between belief and practice.
In contemporary language, rather than the "till death do us part" verbiage that we profess, perhaps it could more accurately read the "till something less difficult and more appealing comes along" that tends to be practiced.
It's widely recognized that continual exposure to failed marriage relationships (lack of devotion) tends to contribute to an increased reluctance to pursue marriage as reasonable option. Could it be that the same is going on with faith identification, particularly as it pertains to participation in a church community? My personal observation is that we are modeling, in practice, a "till something less difficult and more appealing" comes along. The concept of devotion is less appealing than sin, repentance, and what you do with your money.
Sunday we asked, "how can you tell what someone is devoted to?". It wasn't a deep question at all. Within seconds people offered the markers of finances, time, resources. What would it look like in the context of our own lives to overlay that outline? Would people recognize in us, not by words but by practice, a devotion to the "bride" or would they see "until something less difficult and more appealing" comes along?
Could we put it in these terms ... that the Church in our culture struggles with the concept of being devoted to the biblical community often referred to as "the bride" of Christ.
The Acts 2 usage of the term "devoted" is used 5 other places in New Testament teaching, all referring to the idea of sacrificial, persevering and continual steadfastness. As one who has lead many couples through their marriage ceremonies, all speaking in various terms that would be descriptive of this concept, I know only too well of the disconnect between belief and practice.
In contemporary language, rather than the "till death do us part" verbiage that we profess, perhaps it could more accurately read the "till something less difficult and more appealing comes along" that tends to be practiced.
It's widely recognized that continual exposure to failed marriage relationships (lack of devotion) tends to contribute to an increased reluctance to pursue marriage as reasonable option. Could it be that the same is going on with faith identification, particularly as it pertains to participation in a church community? My personal observation is that we are modeling, in practice, a "till something less difficult and more appealing" comes along. The concept of devotion is less appealing than sin, repentance, and what you do with your money.
Sunday we asked, "how can you tell what someone is devoted to?". It wasn't a deep question at all. Within seconds people offered the markers of finances, time, resources. What would it look like in the context of our own lives to overlay that outline? Would people recognize in us, not by words but by practice, a devotion to the "bride" or would they see "until something less difficult and more appealing" comes along?
Thursday, May 7, 2015
We are not as strong as we think we are
We begin this week with a journey through the mission and madness of the community commonly known as the church. I've spent the last 23 years loving and learning from what is biblically known as "the hope of the world". I will admit that, on too many occasions, I am straining to discover any wisdom in Gods plan to use the church for something as monumental as this task. More conversations than I care to admit have centered around my attempts to explain the "why" of being part of a church. I have difficulty defending some of the absurdity and disconnect from what I feel must have been the original wisdom of the plan. The question of "why" church has become even more personal in recent years as we have been laboring to establish this unique expression known as Common Table. After more than 20 years in traditional ministry, no one knows the flaws and failures more intimately than I do ... And let's just say it out loud, unlike others, I don't have the convenient choice of just staying home on a whim. I'm expected to be there. Some would say that I'm paid to be there. I can see the logic in that ... However, in my case, to stop there and assume that you know why a pastor type would be in church week after week, would fall short of the real truth. It's very simple really. The truth is that, when all of the obvious is stripped away, I need to be here. The reality is, in the words of Rich Mullins, "we are not as strong as we think we are". We meaning the collective "we"... The "we"who want to wear the individual label of follower of Jesus, but not be tied down to the corporate gathering of a community. It is the "we" who'd rather be the "I" ...as in the individual.
It's the spiritual equivalent of a 3 year old declaring that "I can do it myself". Biblically and practically speaking, my experience is that we are indeed not as strong as we think we are. Allow me to point out a few of these areas. The first sign of trouble in someone's spiritual life is that they begin to disappear from community. They isolate themselves. Satan is described as one who prowls around, waiting to devour victims in the same way that other predators will go after those who are outside the safety of community. The book of Hebrews encourages us to not give up gathering together because in community is where encouragement and life is found. The book of Acts reveals the incredible power that manifests itself in community. It is all about "we", for safety, for encouragement, for impact, for hope.
There is wisdom in Gods plan, ancient wisdom, from which we have much to learn. I'm intending to lead us down that path over the next few weeks to discover how God intended us to be and the role that we have, collectively, in representing "the hope of the world".
It's the spiritual equivalent of a 3 year old declaring that "I can do it myself". Biblically and practically speaking, my experience is that we are indeed not as strong as we think we are. Allow me to point out a few of these areas. The first sign of trouble in someone's spiritual life is that they begin to disappear from community. They isolate themselves. Satan is described as one who prowls around, waiting to devour victims in the same way that other predators will go after those who are outside the safety of community. The book of Hebrews encourages us to not give up gathering together because in community is where encouragement and life is found. The book of Acts reveals the incredible power that manifests itself in community. It is all about "we", for safety, for encouragement, for impact, for hope.
There is wisdom in Gods plan, ancient wisdom, from which we have much to learn. I'm intending to lead us down that path over the next few weeks to discover how God intended us to be and the role that we have, collectively, in representing "the hope of the world".
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
